: Because it relied on existing physical media rather than complex licensing deals with studios, the service claimed it could offer thousands of titles that traditional platforms like Netflix or Hulu lacked. The "Exclusive" Content Controversy

: Their legal defense relied on a 2013 SCOTUS ruling regarding streaming content to the verified owner of a physical copy.

The term is frequently associated with the "exclusive" nature of the library—specifically, films that were trapped on physical media and had no digital streaming home elsewhere.